search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
CS SOLUTIONS by Ray Taurasi


SUBMIT YOUR QUESTIONS: editor@hpnonline.com


Cavitation testing; shelf placement, protection


Q


We were recently surveyed by The Joint Commission and cited for not performing the cavitation test on the ul- trasonic cleaner. Our department has been utilizing a dyed protein pad in a plastic holder to verify the effectiveness of the ultrasonic washer; but the surveyor said this testing device only verifi es the pres- ence of the cleaning detergent and doesn’t monitor the presence of cavitation in the chamber bath. I read an article about us- ing aluminum foil to assess the presence of cavitation in ultrasonic washers. We have tried the aluminum-foil-test method but found a lot of aluminum foil particles on the bottom of the machine and have discontinued using it because we felt that it was not safe. Our fear is that this proce- dure could lead to small, sharp, aluminum foil particles adhering to the ophthalmic instruments if they are not fully removed. I understand that AAMI standards require a test for cavitation and I want to do what is right, but to be honest I don’t understand the reason we have to run two different tests if the one I am using verifi es the pres- ence of detergent and passes the clean test. Can you suggest a different process for performing safe cavitation testing?


A


AAMI SST79 2017 standards do spe- cifi cally state that cavitation testing should be performed daily whenever the equipment is in use. There are commercial tests available for safely monitoring the presence of cavitation within the ultrasonic bath. (See fi gure 1.)


As you know there are four essential criteria for effective mechanical cleaning: 1.) Chemistry: Proper detergents and concentration must be utilized to break down and remove soil.


2.) Temperature: Temperature must be maintained at the required level to allow chemistry to perform effectively. If it is too high it can cause organic soils, such as blood, to coagulate, making them more challenging to remove.


3.) Mechanical action: The presence of agitation, friction or cavitation is neces- sary to remove soils from the devices that need to be cleaned.


4.) Time: Adequate cycle time must be achieved to allow all components of the cleaning process to perform effectively. It would be possible to have an adequate level of detergent, proper temperature and a required cycle time without the presence of cavitation, in which case the cleaning process would not be ef- fective. A cavitaion test run alone in an ultrasonic bath with just water and no chemistry could pass, confi rming there was adequate cavitation in the bath. Yet a cavitation bath absent of the other essential criteria would not be capable of verifying performance and cleaning capability of the process. Therefore it is necessary to test the ultrasonic per- formance for fulfi llment in meeting all of the essential criteria of mechanical washing. This then may require the combination of more than one testing device. As an end user it is essential that you obtain validation documentation for cavitation testing devices.


Q Figure 1


I am the clinical manager in an ambu- latory surgery center. We have some metal storage shelves with equipment in the OR hallway with reusable vinyl cart covers to protect the items on the shelves from dust and damage.The materials manager has now placed two suture carts in the hallway. Since the sutures are in boxes with plastic protection do those carts still need to be covered? I have not been


42 October 2018 • HEALTHCARE PURCHASING NEWS • hpnonline.com


able to fi nd any relative information in, AORN or AAAHC documents. What are your thoughts on this?


A


You want to be certain that you are not violating any fi re or safety codes


relative to the obstruction of passage in corridors or hallways. Ideally, sterile and clean supplies and equipment should be stored in a restricted, clean, low-traffi c and controlled environment. When open shelving is utilized, stored items need to be protected from damage or contamination. Cart covers can be used to enclose all sides. Solid containment devices, such as plastic covered bins, tote boxes and drawers can also provide protection of items stored on the shelves. When items are placed in such containment devices a cart cover may not be necessary. And if you are utilizing wired shelving units, be certain that the bottom shelf is solid. (See fi gure 2.) HPN


Figure 2


Ray Taurasi is Principal, Healthcare CS Solutions. His healthcare career spans over three decades as an Administrator, Educator, Technologist and Consultant. He is a member of AORN, AHA, SGNA, AAMI and a past president of IAHCSMM. Taurasi has been a faculty member of numerous colleges teaching in the divisions of business administration and health sciences.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64