search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
to be drilled into somewhat to ensure this does not occur.”


Bill Denbigh, TECSYS “The frequency of an internal audit by a sup-


ply chain team really depends on how they are managing their freight [spending]. If the system is aligned with a reputable freight management provider who is handling shipments outside of the distribution network their freight management partner should be completing quarterly reviews of system spend and shipping patterns with supply chain. Similarly, health systems should expect the


same level of review commitment from their distri- bution partner which further helps in providing an overall view of the freight spend of the system. A reputable freight company reviews/audits carrier spending to ensure accuracy for the healthcare system. The overall spending information is re- viewed quarterly with the system.” Gerry Romanelli, TRIOSE, Inc.


“It’s critical for shippers to have visibility to


their costs close to real time to enable and es- tablish a cadence for network cost monitoring. Examples vary.


Winning in the freight escape


Healthcare Purchasing News asked logistics executives to share any success stories of cost effectiveness by customers managing their freight and shipping operations well.


“One of our customers consolidated their total outbound transportation delivery network into a single, well-planned fleet, and they now have drivers that arrive at hospitals or clinics and pro- vide up to 25 transportation services in a single visit. When these services were planned at the departmental level that would have meant there were an additional 24 drivers on the road, one for each service. As you can imagine that is a very significant reduction in cost. “Instead of 25 [drivers], they have one, and


one truck coming to the clinic and performing 25 services. This is obviously an oversimplifica- tion since the dwell time at the stop means that one driver takes a lot longer to service the clinic but the savings are still very significant. We have performed ROI analysis on a health system’s network and the savings are often in the 60+ percent range if the health system takes on all the transportation to a centralized plan. Usually we see a 30 percent type of savings over their transportation budget since the efficiencies come slowly and change has to be gradual.” Bill Denbigh, Director, TECSYS


“Several of MedSpeed’s customers have taken a creative approach to managing non-acute freight spend. Leveraging the fully integrated MedSpeed intra-company logistics networks we have built for each of them, these customers connected MedSpeed with their distributors and encour- age collaboration. The result: Instead of costly freight shipping of supplies to each non-acute facility, the distributors drop ship all supplies to the MedSpeed hub. The MedSpeed team then sorts the items and sends them out on routes that are already visiting each facility to pick up lab specimens, drop of pharmaceuticals and more. By integrating the distributor supply movements with these deliveries, the customer is saving significant time and expense.” Jake Crampton, MedSpeed LLC


“As a healthcare solutions company that pro- vides a freight management solution, TRIOSE helps our healthcare partners look at their total freight spend whether it is impactable by our program or not. For one of our largest customers we uncovered more than just savings on what


they shipped with us but we also evaluated all their Suppliers that would not participate in a freight management program. Armed with this information the Supply Chain group was able to educate the buying and contracting teams on the importance of considering shipping cost when negotiating agreements. A buyer might save a few dollars on an item but give up more by agreeing to restrictive shipping terms. Ultimately when freight is hidden and included it always costs more. We work with our customers to make sure they understand the total landed cost at the time they contract for the goods.” Gerry Romanelli, TRIOSE Inc.


“VPL is in the process of converting one of the largest health systems in the country from a fully managed freight program to a self-management program using our new cloud based self-manage- ment technology platform, “VPL Surpass.” After completing this transition, this health system will realize a first-year incremental savings exceeding $3 million. “Our first customer is one of the largest health


systems in the country and has been utilizing a legacy full-service company for just over eight years. The customer has been mostly pleased with its freight management company, although it had been quite some time since it had seen year-over-year growth in incremental savings. This system takes a rather sophisticated approach to supply chain optimization and because of this is always looking for new ways to fund its various initiatives. With several upcoming projects directly related to supply chain logistics, they began to review all of their freight spending looking for ways to repurpose some of those dollars. As part of this exercise, they wanted to calculate what their legacy freight management company was charging for their services — no easy task since the management fees are hidden in the company’s margins. “After looking at millions of shipping records


and conducting extensive research on carrier pricing patterns, they could calculate a number… $3.39. Their freight management company was making a profit of $3.39 on every shipment they managed for this customer. Now that number doesn’t sound like all that much by


52 August 2018 • HEALTHCARE PURCHASING NEWS • hpnonline.com


itself but this health system had 850,000 man- aged shipments that year alone. That equates to $2.8 million paid in management fees. The customer wanted to repurpose most of these funds, so a decision was made to transition to a self-managed program. “Soon they began to realize that was easier said


than done. Almost a full year later they were no closer to setting up their self-managed program than the day they made the decision. They quickly realized the complexities involved with managing thousands of vendors, shipping thousands of shipments each week into hospitals located all over the country. They also discovered they had no way to process an average of 16,000 carrier shipping charges each week. They first looked for a comprehensive solution. There wasn’t one. Then they looked for a way to cobble a few dis- parate solutions together into a cohesive system. That wouldn’t work with their ERP and account- ing systems. They considered building something from scratch but didn’t have the right experience. They were quickly running out of options. “Shortly after we began development on VPL Surpass, we met with this customer to hear more about its requirements. They had parts of a solu- tion but nothing that would function together as a system. Once we properly understood their requirements, we were confident VPL Surpass would be a perfect solution for them. In the nine months since then, and after many more meetings with their various functional areas, it was agreed that they would be the very first customer for VPL Surpass. The experiences of this customer are hardly unique. There are a growing number of health systems seeking a solution for self-management of freight. “The inbound freight management model has


matured to the point where health systems are now looking for ways to effectively eliminate the need to utilize a third-party freight program. These systems would prefer to transition their freight savings initiatives to an in-house, self- managed model that they have complete control over. The challenge facing these health systems is acquiring the subject matter expertise required to design, implement, staff and manage such a program.”


Don Carroll, Vantage Point Logistics Inc.


Daily: Actively manage the supply chain to


mitigate unnecessary costs. Weekly: Review trends to drive week over


week decision making on incremental improve- ments to service and cost. Monthly: Robust actual (executed) versus


budget performance metrics. Quarterly/Bi-Annually: Market benchmarking


to surgically refine carrier solution. Annually: Defined RFP strategies tied to under- standing of market conditions.” Norman Brouillette, Ryder System, Inc.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64