search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
INDUSTRY INFORMATION Educational Supply Chain Programs, continued...


Stonehill College, Easton, MA, http://www.stonehill.edu/academics/areas-of-study/healthcare-administration/healthcare-supply-chain-manage/ Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, https://www.syracuse.edu/academics/undergraduate-majors-minors/supply-chain-management/ Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, https://mays.tamu.edu/bba-supply-chain-management/ Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX, http://www.neeley.tcu.edu/Academic_Departments/Info_Sys_Supply_Chain_Mgt/Supply_Chain_Mgt.aspx University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, http://waltoncollege.uark.edu/lscm/ University of Cincinnati, https://www.uc.edu/ces/what-can-you/major_product_infor_supply_mgt.html University of Houston, https://www.bauer.uh.edu/undergraduate/supply-chain-management/ University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, https://carlsonschool.umn.edu/departments/supply-chain-operations-department University of North Texas, Dallas, https://www.unt.edu/pais/insert/ulogi.htm University of Oklahoma, Norman, http://www.ou.edu/price/marketing_supplychainmanagement University of Pennsylvania-The Wharton School, Philadelphia, http://hcmg.wharton.upenn.edu/ University of San Diego, https://www.sandiego.edu/business/graduate/ms-supply-chain-management/ University of South Carolina, https://www.sc.edu/study/colleges_schools/moore/academic_departments_and_research/academic_departments/depart- ment_of_management_science/index.php and https://www.sc.edu/study/colleges_schools/moore/business_solutions/research_and_partnership_centers/ operations_and_supply_chain_center/index.php


University of South Florida, Tampa, http://www.usf.edu/business/departments/marketing/supply-chain-management/graduate.aspx University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, (Global Supply Chain Institute at the Haslam College of Business) http://gsci.utk.edu/ The University of Texas at Austin, https://www.mccombs.utexas.edu/Departments/IROM/Degree-Programs/BBA/SCM University of Texas at Dallas, https://jindal.utdallas.edu/isom/operations-scm-programs/ University of Wisconsin-Madison, https://bus.wisc.edu/centers/grainger-center-for-supply-chain-management University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, http://www4.uwm.edu/business/programs/bba/major/bbascom.cfm Western Michigan University, https://www.wmich.edu/supplychain/


The Institute for Supply Management comprehensive state-by-state list: ism.ws/membership/content.cfm?ItemNumber=4742 GPO Headliners 2019


HPN lists the top GPOs with a minimum annual purchasing volume of $500 million in a broad range of product and service categories and that are not shareholders or members in other GPOs. These numbers represent fi scal year 2018 unless otherwise noted.


GPO Name 1. Vizient


2. Premier Inc. 3. HealthTrust


4. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs 5. PDM Healthcare 6. Intalere


7. The Resource Group (Ascension)


8. U.S. Department of Defense/Defense Logistics Agency 9. Resource Optimization & Innovation 10. MAGNET Group


Disclaimers/Full Disclosure


1. Vizient reported fi scal year 2018 results at press time. The fi gure reported represents actual purchases through its contracts, independent of any distributor fees or any other additional infl ationary measurers. Vizient said the APV refl ects true dollar purchases through our GPO contracts.


2. Premier re-emphasized its conservativism in reporting its APV as it uses members actual spend data related to Premier contracts and not their total non-labor expense spend, which would be a much larger number. Premier reiterated that it does not believe that historically all GPOs used a similar or similarly conservative methodology. Consequently, Premier shared the most recent number Premier executives use in presentations to current and prospective members.


3. HealthTrust at press time was in the fi nal stages of acquiring ROi but declined to include ROis APV within its total for this year.


4. The VAs fi gure represents VHA contracts that include about 14 billion in VHA FSS and NCS sales and 1 billion in VHA non-FSS and non-NCS sales. The 15 bil- lion is largely healthcare-related and includes whatever is necessary to run VHA hospitals and clinics. Further, another 1.4 billion represents VBA Medical Disability Evaluations MDE contracts and 1 billion for its Cerner electronic health record contract.


5. PDM Healthcare chose not share its annual purchasing volume, due to its proprietary nature, but assisted HPN in ranking itself based on an unaudited analysis of member facilities actual dollars in aggregate for budgeted-for goods and services through manufacturers.


6. Intalere declined to disclose its annual purchasing volume, due to its proprietary nature, but assisted HPN in ranking itself based on an estimated, unaudited analysis of the aggregate member facilities budgeted-for goods and services.


8. This total represents FY2018 medical spending for the Defense Logistics Agency of the Department of Defense as FY2019 data would not be available for several weeks at press time. The DLA is a subset of the DoD that handles medical logistics. DLA medical spending comprises pharmaceuticals  including vaccines, medical/ surgical items, high-dollar capital equipment, hospital equipment, medical assemblies/kits and medical supplies that span laboratory, dental, optical, sports medicine and surgical implants.


9. Resource Optimization  Innovation ROi reported a fi gure that includes contract purchases in seven major categories  pharmaceuticals, medical/surgical supplies, capital equipment, laboratory supplies, dietary/food service/nutrition supplies, purchased services and physician preference items. The fi gure does not count distribution volume. At press time, ROi had not yet been acquired by HealthTrust, which was then fi nalized before this publication was distributed.


10. MAGNET Group did not respond to HPN requests for comment. In past years, the GPO declined to disclose its annual purchasing volume, due to its proprietary nature, but HPN was able to list the GPO based on its relative position to the purchasing volume of the nearest competitors.


Please note that HPN strives to be as accurate as possible with these numbers that the GPOs report. Further, HPN acknowledges that historically some GPOs have derived their totals by such tactics as double-counting product purchases through manufacturers and distributors, as well as including purchasing volumes of facilities where they provide consulting services but do not provide direct contractual purchasing activity, and by counting a hospitals entire purchasing volume even though the hospital funnels only a percentage through that GPO, among other strategies and tactics. HPN brings these caveats to readers attention to show that it strives to provide these numbers in good faith as a service and must trust the ethics of the responders in answering as truthfully as possible.


Source Healthcare Purchasing News research via GPO self-reported data through interviews and available online sources and educated estimates where data were not available, October 2019 10 Source Guide 2020 • HEALTHCARE PURCHASING NEWS • hpnonline.com


Location Irving, TX


Charlotte, NC Nashville


Washington Cleveland St. Louis St. Louis


Washington St. Louis


Web address


www.vizientinc.com www.premierinc.com www.healthtrustpg.com www.va.gov/plo/


www.pdmhealthcare.com theresourcegroup.com/ www.intalere.com


www.dla.mil/TroopSupport www.roiscs.com


Mechanicsburg, PA www.magnetgroup.com APV


$103B* $61B* $42B*


$17.4B* * *


$8.4B


$7.1B* $2.6B* *


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68